🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and shared fresh requests had come from mediators to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

Araghchi is treading a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, EU nations exercised their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if discussions restart.

The American leader last week stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to enforce their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and remains the primary answer to resolve disputes, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a response in the same language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to break. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the wake of this invasion."